that would be a matter of law and they would have a hard time proving that someone is a threat to them because they have a gun if that person doesn't have a history of shooting people.

my new theme song



erikboyd60@hotmail.com

"True poetry can communicate before it is understood"

-T.S. Eliot

battle record:

7-0-0

Of course not . But society is decentralized on every level so every neighborhood , city etc. must decide their own fate about everything including guns

The community itself . In the case of a "police force," this would not exist either as a public or private specialized body or company. If a local community did consider that public safety required a body of people who could be called upon for help, we imagine that a new system would be created. Such a system would "not be entrusted to, as it is today, to a special, official body: all able-bodied inhabitants [of a commune] will be called upon to take turns in the security measures instituted by the commune. This system would be based around a voluntary militia system, in which all members of the community could serve if they so desired. Those who served would not constitute a professional body; instead the service would be made up of local people who would join for short periods of time and be replaced if they abused their position. Hence the likelihood that a communal militia would become corrupted by power, like the current police force or a private security firm exercising a policing function, would be vastly reduced. Moreover, by accustoming a population to intervene in anti-social acts as part of the militia, they would be empowered to do so when not an active part of it, so reducing the need for its services even more.

i concur, the reality around us at this current moment is very very bizarre and almost matrix like concerning people being so drawn away from real world issues.

The point is this entity still has authority over people, whether or not it is abused.

OK then a neighborhood watch has authority mmkay . dude stop babbling .

What authority and over who ?

Communes defend themselves nobody offers them protection . Your PDA's are specialized coercive bodies which can disrupt strikes and bash labor unions or anything that the BOSS tells them to do . Its free market JUSTICE where the boss has supreme DICTATORIAL authority over his given property everything including people are his property and he can do whatever he wants whit them Murray Rothbard admits it and don't start whit that negative rights BS because POWER CORRUPTS . there is no self determination in your system those that OWN RULE they that don't are RULED .

OK then me whit the people i know in my hood defending my own hood is considering policing and militaristic . Yeah OK .

Policing: Regulation and control of the affairs of a community, especially with respect to maintenance of order, law, health, morals, safety, and other matters affecting the public welfare.