Indeed it's an agreement between everyone . Voluntary association , free agreement and free association nobody is ruled by no one . . If you agree you participate if you don't you don't everything is done FACE TO FACE . As for the Spanish Civil War i already proved my point in the other thread i quote " the very fact that every village was a mixture of collectivists and individualists shows that the peasants had not been forced into communal farming at the point of a gun ".

call it ? but it works EXACTLY LIKE A FUCKING STATE . You simply ignore everything i said . By modern standards used in modern political science your society will still have one or even several states .

A state creates a legal system and creates LAWS in modern times such legal systems are bind to citizens trough something called " social contract" for an anarchist you really have no idea what a state is and how it works .

Leave where ? What rules ? rules are created when both parties agree that's why is FREE AGREEMENT when both parties don't agree then those rules are not created you subvert cooperation and present it as statist . That's why its participatory it eliminates the social contract and it's not fixed . If one objects then the whole deal falls . Plus you partake in decision-making processes at the degree you are affected by that decision making process .

Laws ? Oh gosh no . We abolish prisons we abolish the courts we abolish everything statist . Disputes between citizens can be done at a largely social level.

"Although CNT-FAI publications cited numerous cases of peasant proprietors and tenant farmers who had adhered voluntarily to the collective system, there can be no doubt that an incomparably larger number doggedly opposed it or accepted it only under extreme duress...The fact is...that many small owners and tenant farmers were forced to join the collective farms before they had an opportunity to make up their minds freely."

"Even if the peasant proprietor and tenant farmer were not compelled to adhere to the collective system, there were several factors that made life difficult for recalcitrants; for not only were they prevented from employing hired labor and disposing freely as their crops, as has already been seen, but they were often denied all benefits enjoyed by members...Moreover, the tenant farmer, who had believed himself freed from the payment of rent by the execution or flight of the landowner or of his steward, was often compelled to continue such payment to the village committee. All these factors combined to exert a pressure almost as powerful as the butt of the rifle, and eventually forced the small owners and tenant farmers in many villages to relinquish their land and other possessions to the collective farms."

-Burnett Bolloten

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnett_Bolloten

http://uweb.cas.usf.edu/ssphs/vol1no2.html

That's why capitalism FAILS.

Don't you get it? The very fundamental element of capitalism is growth and expansion. Therefore monopoly is inevitable, especially when given no regulation.
The blunt fact is that it is a selfish system of financial conquest. It's financial empiricism. Everyone seeks to drain the world and profit, and control their parts gained to maintain profits. It inherently requires eventual monopoly.

If we let capitalism ravage the planet for another 100 years, I guarantee it will be world monopoly.