|
Vegetarianism
|
|
| I_Guy |
Date: Saturday, 06/Feb/10, 6:24 PM | Message # 226 |
Heads
Posts: 1792
|
Quote (abanks47) since the meat is being used That's the problem, it's not being used. It's wasted all the time. Do you see the problem now? Quote (abanks47) how is it that you eating no meat similar to that of someone fighting to get an ENTIRE RACE OF PEOPLE WHOS ORIGINAL SKIN COLOR WAS CLEANSED FROM 100S OF YEARS OF RAPE SIMILAR Get it through you thick head. I've already said that it isn't so much about "eating meat" or "not eating meat." It's about the industry of animal use. The industry of animal use is much like the industry of slavery. Therefore the philosophy behind a vegitarian is much like the philosophy behind a slavery abolitionist, because both see these industries as morally atrocious and we want it eliminated. I don't blame people for eating meat just like I don't blame our founding fathers for having slaves. It's a difficult complicated problem. Our founding fathers had slaves because slaves were available, they knew it was wrong philosophically. People eat meat because it is available, even though they might know that it is wrong philosophically. SO THEREFORE, the elimination of the industry eliminates the availability, so therefore no one can have slaves or eat meat. Because many people will continue to do something if it is philosophically (or even morally wrong) as long as there is a foundational authoritative industry keeping it going. Sure vegitarians and abolitionists don't parallel 100%. Sure animals and slaves don't parallel 100%. But they do parallel significantly unquestionably. Quote (abanks47) Human minds are more complex are they not? Do you feel slaves think the same way animals do? no i dont think you do so i feel the fear maybe a tad more intense for the slaves Fear is fear. I'm not sure brain complexity affects fear intensity. Quote (abanks47) Now your cross referencing old shit? dont double down your "points No, I'm incorporating a past conclusion (which you accepted) to further extend other points. "Don't double down my point"? That's how arguments work. If a past conclusion is accepted then it is incorporated later to make the argument stronger. Quote (abanks47) keeping of animals for food i dont really see as subjugation. Don't forget, we used to (and somewhat still do) use animals in war, labor, gambling, and entertainment. That is subjigation. Quote (abanks47) agreed, oh dont forget the point where it helps sustain human life in terms of the "subjugation" of animals Slave-masters thought that slaves helped sustained the master-race's life. Quote (abanks47) not true by any means, thats poor parenting if that is the case LOL, not true by any means? Might I recall a comment by one of our own... Quote (ALCATRAZ) Because we are the top of the food chain. Animal law plain and simple. Until the return of the Annunaki, we run shit. End of story He's implying that because we determine we are at the top of the food chain, then all the animals automatically become victims of our use, because "we run shit." Quote (abanks47) where does anyone say, i keep this bull because the bible says it coo? Genesis 1:26 "Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” Quote (abanks47) agreed, i like how you felt the need to say some humans here. do you think all humans are guilty of your other "points" Nope, only "some" on that particular point. But yes, for most of the other points all people are guilty to some degree. Quote (abanks47) agreed, once again distinguishing between some and all humans Irrelevant. The parallel is still concrete. Quote (abanks47) in your opinion, your a vegetarian NO, NOT in my opinion. Do you realize that all those P's are premises? You agreed to P6, P9, P10, and P11. All of the premises are independent and do not rely on each other for support. Therefore if you accept ANY ONE of those premises then you HAVE to accept the conclusion. The factuality of the premises is what determines opinion or not. If you can refute or disprove those premises then you can turn the conclusion (C2) into my opinion. But that is irrelevent, because you agreed to four of those premises and therefore the conclusion given is necessitated, and beings you accepted the supporting premises it makes that conclusion an "opinion" of both mine and yours. Quote (abanks47) in some cases. ive seen a house for someones dogs before. i know my cat is not living in a fucking shack so i can guarantee she is not in slave like conditions See P14. Quote (abanks47) some people allow there animals to come and go as they please, my cat has this luxury but likes being in the slaves quarters more Some people allowed regulated freedom to their slaves as well. Quote (abanks47) ive seen dogs dine on ribs and steak while i had a McD's bag in hand. ive seen dogs eat the same food im eating. this is not the case for all Very few dogs eat ribs and steak. If their owner is wealthy then sure maybe. Some personal house slaves ate well too if they had wealthy masters. But feeding a dog ribs and steak would be pretty expensive for most middle class folks. The majority of animals are fed pet food or factory-farm food. And it's lousy food. All factory-farm animals are fed lousy food. The majority of house pets are fed lousy food. Quote (abanks47) i thought slaves were of value? They were of value and depending on the plantation, they might recieve medical care depending on the severity of their illness, if the illness is even known to be had. But the fact is that many simply fell through the cracks because the system was to big. Quote (abanks47) LOL, yeah i dress pigeons up in suits and make them serve me dinner. no purposes are entirley different and i feel is much more rare than salves were forced to do The specific way in which they serve us isn't so important. The fact that they SERVE us (rather they want to or not), is the important point. LOL, I list premises (P19-P23) that compare the use of animals to slaves and you agree to them all, and then I conclude that the use of animals actually is in fact much like the use of slaves, and you say "no." The answer can only be "yes" if you accept my premises. Quote (abanks47) accept we eventually won, or did you not read that far ahead? See P28. Quote (abanks47) you left out raped and killed. The animals are killed (I don't mean for food, I mean at times they are killed by the abuse itself). Rape is an irrelevant factor. Because believe me, if people were into raping animals they would. Quote (abanks47) we dont go hunting birds and raccoons. Yes we do. Quote (abanks47) if a bear comes down from the mountains and there is room for danger than they tranq it and return it. if it comes back and there is potential for danger than they kill it. its for your protection. Yeah the law might do that. But there are plenty of dumb ass rednecks (my uncle) and other dumb asses who will find any excuse to get to fire there gun, especially if it is actually at something, and especially if they feel they are doing anybody a favor. Quote (abanks47) and slaves weren't simply murdered for wandering into white neighborhoods. they were murdered for being black. its very likely that someone who was killed in a white neighborhood would be killed in a black neighborhood buy the very same people. whites would cruise the block looking for victims on occasion Then I'll rephrase the premise: P27-2 Sometimes animals are murdered for being "where they don't belong" just like slaves/blacks were murdered for being "where they don't belong." Animals are sometimes murdered for being "where they don't belong" because they are animals in a human's territory. Slaves/blacks were sometimes murdered for being "where they don't belong" because they were black in white territory. As far as whites going out and searching for blacks to hang or kill otherwise, you just made me think of another premise: P27.5 Some animals are hunted down by humans (sometimes to be murdered) just like some slaves/blacks were hunted down by slavemasters/whites (sometimes to be murdered). Quote (abanks47) disregard the blacks saying they deserved freedom the 100s of years. disregard the fight they put up. im sure its the moral consciousness of whites that did the trick. Blacks never would have been libertated if whites didn't force other whites to relinquish their control. Ever hear of Abe Lincoln? Or John Brown? Don't get me wrong, the rebellions helped open people's eyes, but rebellions alone wouldn't have changed the system. The oppression was too heavy. Let's not turn this into a which race did what. Quote (abanks47) as i say below i am not in complete control but i dont let emotions get the best of me and try not to let them affect my judgment or allow me to act in a crazy manner Even judgement is prewritten by emotion. Quote (abanks47) I dont even know how to respond to this. you quoted me and i expected a response to what i said. You asked what good is emotion. I explained: It's biologically healthy. Quote (abanks47) i show emotion just not like a blossoming little girl. Right, because only blossoming little girls show emotion like blossoming little girls. Quote (abanks47) im at work and someone offends me i wont drop to me knees and scream Who does? What the hell is your point? Why has your argument taken this route? Are you trying to find a way to plug in and prove your manliness by finding a way to incorporate it into are convo? It has no relevance. This shit would only be relevant if I was cussing and calling you names and typing bold like THIS and throwing a tantrum. But no one is doing that so why are you talking about people throwing fits? Quote (abanks47) i man up and am professional and do what the fuck i get paid for. emotions can be controlled agreed never entirely but to a very and completely manageable level. Besides you know that's a lie. Everyone loses it once in while. Maybe not at work, but somewhere. But even this point is irrelevant as it begins to bridge onto a new argument. So drop this.
We all know that each of our end is near; the question is do we accept the end of our living existence, or do we accept our existence as dead men...
|
|
|
|
| I_Guy |
Date: Saturday, 06/Feb/10, 6:57 PM | Message # 227 |
Heads
Posts: 1792
|
Just watch that "Earthlings" video man. You'll agree with me. Aside from the whole animal-slavery parallel and the dozens of philosophical/moral aspects, the fact that animal slaughter supports multi-international corporations that hold sway over society is enough to say fuck it. Also, not to mention, raising lifestock is inefficient. And then there are the health issues, both by the nature of meat and by the contamination of meat. Now they're trying to sell cloned animal meat without sufficient longterm studies. They are also partaking in gene patenting so that they can modify ainmal genetics, which is absurd. Then I can talk all day about the product waste this industry creates. What do you think happens when meat goes bad in the store? Plus, families waste meat on a daily basis. These corporations pollute the earth and they deliberately fuck independent farms out of business. Need I go on?
We all know that each of our end is near; the question is do we accept the end of our living existence, or do we accept our existence as dead men...
|
|
|
|
| eboyd |
Date: Saturday, 06/Feb/10, 9:18 PM | Message # 228 |
Heads
Posts: 13145
|
Quote (abanks47) if it were proven to be without a doubt on all those terms you mentioned true than sure why not. i would still be concerned over the lasting affects though. i never said the way animals are treated was not important, but i still feel the enslavement of an entire race of people to be a little more important than the killing of animals for our sustenance. it is not a fucking genocide or a holocaust, im sorry but i do not see it as such. I'm sure there are people who do commit genocide against animals but i do not see the food industry as committing this "atrocity" since the meat is being used The people that run the food industry are committing genocide by not actively searching for viable meat substitutes and trying to eliminate meat production, essentially eliminating meat consumption, and bringing awareness to their campaign to try to eliminate meat production. Quote (abanks47) the shit your giving me is still no proof of that. how is it that you eating no meat similar to that of someone fighting to get an ENTIRE RACE OF PEOPLE WHOS ORIGINAL SKIN COLOR WAS CLEANSED FROM 100S OF YEARS OF RAPE SIMILAR. YOU SOUND LIKE AN IDIOT FOR EVEN MAKING THAT CLAIM. First off, race is a human creation. Just thought I'd make that clear. Second, proof is only pertinent to mathematics. Outside of math, there is only evidence. For example, in a court case, a smoking gun with fingerprints on it may be evidence that the defendant was guilty, but it is still possible that maybe someone forced them to grab the gun. That is evidence. It is never 100% conclusive, but there are degrees of certainty that we can draw from evidence. A good comparison here would be medical diagnoses. You don't need every symptom to be diagnosed with a disease. Third, if we realize that there is a possibility for a viable alternative but we are hardly researching this alternative, then it becomes clear that the comparison is, in fact, quite equivalent. Quote (abanks47) Once again, your generalizing the human race as if we all do this. maybe you do these things but i for one do not. That's not at all what he was doing. And we could say the same for slavery. I could cherry-pick multiple accounts of white owners who treated slaves great. It is even possible that a majority of slave owners treated their slaves well (considering most landowners of that time owned at least one slave and most people are good people). Quote (abanks47) Human minds are more complex are they not? Do you feel slaves think the same way animals do? no i dont think you do so i feel the fear maybe a tad more intense for the slaves So because animals are less intelligent than humans they can't possibly fear as much as human slaves and therefore their fear should be disregarded? Lol Quote (abanks47) the keeping of animals for food i dont really see as subjugation. its there for eating the keeping of black people for labor i dont really see as subjugation. its there for purposes of household and horticultural assistance. Quote (abanks47) dont forget the point where it helps sustain human life in terms of the "subjugation" of animals dont forget the point where there is hardly any research done to find a viable substitute for meat in order to actively search to put an end to the subjugation of animals, and also the point where human slave labor takes necessary labor out of the hands of the slave owner so that they can conveniently take care of more important things. Quote (abanks47) Quote (I_Guy) C4: The use of animals is much like the use of slaves no After agreeing to everything you agreed with, how can you deny this? And no "because we need it to sustain life", because as I've explained before, we don't even attempt to search for a viable substitute (which we know exists, and even if it didn't, it doesn't hurt to try researching it).
my new theme song
erikboyd60@hotmail.com
"True poetry can communicate before it is understood"
-T.S. Eliot
battle record:
7-0-0
|
|
|
|
| J-Breakz |
Date: Saturday, 06/Feb/10, 10:35 PM | Message # 229 |
Heads
Posts: 2162
|
Eboyd has joined the dark side... the crazy veghead side. As a football fan, I'm ashamed of you sir
livin life like some cheesy movie
|
|
|
|
| EmSeeD |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 0:23 AM | Message # 230 |
Heads
Posts: 11464
|
Quote (I_Guy) But no one is doing that so why are you talking about people throwing fits? probably because he actually is the one throwing fits and typing in big cap letters 
http://chirbit.com/emseed http://youtube.com/siwooot
|
|
|
|
| ALCATRAZ |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 0:59 AM | Message # 231 |
Writers
Posts: 473
|
"I personally think OBCL2 is better than the original" - Lord Meth 
|
|
|
|
| I_Guy |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 1:16 AM | Message # 232 |
Heads
Posts: 1792
|
Eboyd already posted that video pages ago and I already responded to it. Keep up with the thread or stay our of it.
We all know that each of our end is near; the question is do we accept the end of our living existence, or do we accept our existence as dead men...
|
|
|
|
| ALCATRAZ |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 1:17 AM | Message # 233 |
Writers
Posts: 473
|
Sorry, I didn't have time to go through seventeen pages of bullshit.
"I personally think OBCL2 is better than the original" - Lord Meth 
|
|
|
|
| I_Guy |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 1:22 AM | Message # 234 |
Heads
Posts: 1792
|
Then stay the fuck out. Don't just abruptly jump in and drop ignorant comments based on uninformed judgments. It's groundless. Sure, you can do so, but you'll continue to recieve responses like this. If you're going to fuck with this thread, know it, or ask questions about what's up. Contribute something substantial.
We all know that each of our end is near; the question is do we accept the end of our living existence, or do we accept our existence as dead men...
|
|
|
|
| eboyd |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 2:04 AM | Message # 235 |
Heads
Posts: 13145
|
Quote (J-Breakz) Eboyd has joined the dark side... the crazy veghead side. As a football fan, I'm ashamed of you sir man, come on! I've held the same position the whole time! I'm still not a vegetarian though. In fact, I just had 2 4X4's from In 'n' Out 
my new theme song
erikboyd60@hotmail.com
"True poetry can communicate before it is understood"
-T.S. Eliot
battle record:
7-0-0
|
|
|
|
| ALCATRAZ |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 2:23 AM | Message # 236 |
Writers
Posts: 473
|
Quote (I_Guy) Then stay the fuck out. Don't just abruptly jump in and drop ignorant comments based on uninformed judgments. Look at the very first post in this thread. Read it. You are asking me what my thoughts are, so I posted a song that reflected my thoughts. If you'd take the time to get the sand out of your snatch you'd see that I have as much a right to post my thoughts as do you. Otherwise, why would you ask me for my thoughts? You mad I have an opinion of my own?
"I personally think OBCL2 is better than the original" - Lord Meth 
|
|
|
|
| J-Breakz |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 2:35 AM | Message # 237 |
Heads
Posts: 2162
|
Quote (eboyd) 2 4X4's from In 'n' Out Ah man!! In n out?! I haven't had in n out forever. That's the best fast food joint. I thought In n Out was just in San Diego lol
livin life like some cheesy movie
|
|
|
|
| I_Guy |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 2:35 AM | Message # 238 |
Heads
Posts: 1792
|
Quote (ALCATRAZ) Otherwise, why would you ask me for my thoughts? You mad I have an opinion of my own? You've been dropping in and out of this thread for the last few pages dropping insubstantial posts. Then mocking one of my posts in your sig. And I'm sure you didn't even read my long ass argument to support my claim in your sig. "An uphill battle" for me huh? You say shit like that and don't even see if that becomes true. That's the kind of shit I'm talking about. And yeah, you got every right to be in any thread you like. But like I said, you come in talking dumb ass shit then you'll continue to recieve responses like this one.
We all know that each of our end is near; the question is do we accept the end of our living existence, or do we accept our existence as dead men...
|
|
|
|
| EmSeeD |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 3:48 AM | Message # 239 |
Heads
Posts: 11464
|
Quote (I_Guy) You've been dropping in and out of this thread for the last few pages dropping insubstantial posts. Then mocking one of my posts in your sig. And I'm sure you didn't even read my long ass argument to support my claim in your sig. he probably doesn't want to read your arguments because he's afraid he might be wrong and have to change his sig.
http://chirbit.com/emseed http://youtube.com/siwooot
|
|
|
|
| eboyd |
Date: Sunday, 07/Feb/10, 5:16 AM | Message # 240 |
Heads
Posts: 13145
|
Quote (J-Breakz) Ah man!! In n out?! I haven't had in n out forever. That's the best fast food joint. I thought In n Out was just in San Diego lol Haha nah, In 'n' Out is all over California, as well as Fatburger. Neither can be found outside of Cali though. And I agree. I won't eat at any other fast food burger joint. We have one directly on the border of our town and the neighboring town, both of which have schools with football teams that are decent, neither of which had played each other since the 80's, who have a tradition of going to In 'n' Out after every game. The schools are approximately the same distance from the In 'n' Out except for in opposite directions, so it's perfect for both schools to go to as an after-the-game hang out..... that is, until my senior year in 2005 when, after 25 years or so, my coaches decided that they wanted to schedule a game against them. That game became the game that would decide the rights to In 'n' Out for the year. That game turned out to be great. I blocked a punt with less than 2 minutes left in the game and we recovered it. With a few seconds left I lead my running back to a touchdown to win the game. That was some of the most exciting shit ever. We owned In 'n' Out for the year the best part is that back when we played each other consistently (in the 80's) we used to lose to them every year consistently. Everyone KNEW they were better than us but we beat them and went on to win the league championship, proving that they were WRONG! 
my new theme song
erikboyd60@hotmail.com
"True poetry can communicate before it is understood"
-T.S. Eliot
battle record:
7-0-0
|
|
|
|