Quote (ALCATRAZ)
I don't know, honestly. But what I do know is that Lil Wayne and his bodyguard are not connected at the hip. It is possible that his bodyguard was somewhere that Lil Wayne wasn't. It's a definite possibility.
dude, it's not like his bodyguard was rolling in a Honda Civic through the hood by himself or even a single Escalade. he was rolling in an ENTOURAGE OF ESCALADES which just so happens to be EXACTLY what Lil Wayne rolls in and was rolling in while signing autographs. come on now... mathematics... it works, i swear.
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
A bitch? Very likely. Guilty of being in the Escalade? Not enough proof.
i never said that it was proof of him being in the Escalade, and if i did (i'm too lazy to go back and look lol) that was not my intention.
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
Remember, my argument has nothing to do with Lil Wayne being a thug.
mine DOES though. it has the whole time. half of my argument (the three factors in that guy's video) is based on proof that he was in the car at the situation, the other half (the part where i am talking about his silence) is based on the fact that even if he wasn't in the Escalade, he's still, as my friends who are thugs would call him, "bitch made".
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
That's not the issue we're dealing with here. I am only discussing Lil Wayne being at the scene of the altercation. Save the thug stuff for another thread.
no, this whole thread is about that and my entire argument revolves around that so please do not divert the argument.
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
Right, but the definition I gave was subjective. I only stated it to show you that just because someone is silent doesn't necessarily mean they are guilty, of ANYTHING. It could very well mean that they are soft, or a bitch as you called it, but it SILENCE DOES NOT EQUAL GUILT ... that is the truth and you must respect that ... Our country's judicial system is based on principles stemming from this truth exclusively.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
Lil Wayne is the top dog in the realm of mainstream rap. How do you know he wasn't just staying quiet to make sure 40 Glocc didn't get any publicity? Like I said, rappers go to extreme lengths to get some shine. I agree with you that Wayne was doing the smart thing. Not because he was guilty of being at the altercation, but because he wasn't giving 40 Glocc any more shine than he deserves -- none.
possible, but given how rap works, when you are the top dog and you don't respond, that hurts your career. the people that listen to hip hop and know about the incident (it was publicized and a lot of people saw it, or at least enough to possibly lose Wayne a lot of fans) would lose respect for him for doing nothing, especially if he's trying to appeal to gang members or make himself sound like a gang member by saying "SOO-WOOT!" in his music. so regardless of whether or not he was trying to give him shine, it got publicized enough to where he needed to respond or fans would lose respect for him, unless he was actually scared of something far worse than loss of record sales. maybe he wised up and realized that if he kept claiming he was going to end up dead.
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
Direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion (in criminal law, an assertion of guilt or of innocence) directly, i.e., without an intervening inference. Circumstantial evidence, by contrast, directly supports the truth of evidence, from which the truth of the assertion may be inferred.
For example: a witness who testifies that he saw the defendant shoot the victim gives direct evidence. A forensics expert who says that ballistics proves that the defendant’s gun shot the bullet that killed the victim gives circumstantial evidence, from which B’s guilt may be inferred.
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
So looking at that example given, your "evidence" AT THE MOST is circumstantial, NOT direct ... NOT concrete ...
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
Direct evidence would be Lil Wayne rolling down the window in plain sight of the camera during the altercation, not a clip of his bodyguard or Wayne in a similar car on a different day. Jesus Christ man, this is not rocket science. It is definitely possible, even LIKELY that Wayne was in that Escalade that day in South Central. But the reality is you don't know as much as the next person. All you know is that Wayne's bodyguard was possibly there. That is ALL we know about the incident. Other than that nothing holds up. POSSIBLE, EVEN LIKELY, BUT NOT ABSOLUTE.
i'm sorry for not being a law major and not knowing the terms when it comes to American law. either way, it is most definitely circumstantial and since when is circumstantial evidence not reliable? we have to rely solely on circumstantial evidence when it comes to many aspects of science. for example, the theory of relativity is solely based on circumstantial evidence (evidence from experimentation and mathematical proof) but it is one of the most wide spread and agreed upon theories in existence.
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
When discussing the criminal activities of 2Pac you gave me no leeway. Everything I presented you challenged at different angles to see if my argument would hold up. I succeeded in that challenge because I presented evidence that was DIRECT and could be CONFIRMED
YOU argue that you succeeded, but let's recap here: you gave me a series of videos of 2pac discussing what he did and claiming "Thug Life" and all that, and one video where Mopreme is talking about 2pac shooting cops and evidence of him being in court for it BUT there's also the fact that the cops had broken his window and were assaulting him FOR NO REASON and that fact STOOD UP IN COURT. if my dad had a gun with him (yes, my dad occasionally takes his gun with him illegally, especially when going through a bad neighborhood, just to make sure we're safe) and he was getting assaulted by police officers he probably would have shot them too. my dad isn't a thug and that fact wouldn't make him a thug. a majority of what you presented is hearsay. i presented a video that, using circumstantial evidence, shows that it is very likely that Lil Wayne is not as hard as he claims to be and probably not a "thug" or affiliated with the bloods.
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
I am simply giving you the same treatment you gave me earlier.
no, you aren't for the aforementioned reason.
Quote (ALCATRAZ)
If there are any holes in your argument, I will find them. And it seems as if I already have. Again, no hate towards you. I am just not too keen on conspiracy theorists. I deal with facts.
holes, yes. there are holes in the theory of evolution, but we still trust it because it is our best bet.
btw, man, wtf happened to me????? i didn't used to be such an asshole!!! man, i'm sorry. it's just those comments about white people "not knowing" just because we're white, i've heard them so many times that they just struck a chord. i'm very sorry. i am glad that you have given up this attitude of "winning" (with me at least) though.
btw, J-Breakz, if you read this, if i came off like that in the "Anarcho-Capitalist" thread (seemingly like it was all about winning, which is something you pointed out, though i wasn't trying to do that), i'm sorry 