But don't get me wrong though, I'm not defending communism, but you can see how it contrasts your use of anarcho-capitalism (as if the term makes any sense). Capitalism inherently has hierarchy no matter what. "Communistic" China is state capitalistic. You are antistate capitalism, so you are basically the opposite, but that doesn't remove the problem of capitalistic hierarchy.

An agency doesn't guarantee property rights. The RIGHT TO OWN property is not GIVEN by these agencies. The RIGHT TO OWN property is PROTECTED by these agencies.

Ok, I understand that. If an agency guaranteed property rights than it would be a government, no?

Added (04/Dec/09, 7:45 Pm)
---------------------------------------------

As much as the CEO seems to be a top dog they are still at the mercy of the majority. Without the majorities demand they would be nothing.

Ants naturally take care of their business its in their system they don't need coercive authority . There is no coercive authority because it will be unnatural to be one . The whole biological infrastructure of the race will fail if there is coercive authority . If there is coercive authority then working ants won't work anymore because their biological infrastructure changed so they don't know to handle their own business naturally as they did .

exactly

Its pretty much what Karl Marx envisioned in his late career the Marxist fools are still waiting for the state to whiter away and all that crap . Bakunin warned Karl Marx that state monopoly leads to totalitarianism . And he has right instead of listening to Bakunin he kicked out Bakunin and most anarchists from the first international and this act lastly saw the final rupture between anarchists and Marxists because there are 2 strains of socialism here the Marxist one and the anarchist one these 2 date back to the first international .

There are allowed to be businesses with a worker co-op structure, and if it is as efficient as you guys say it is then it should be able to compete with any other business on the market.

exactly even within a pure free market the excessive at all cost accumulation of capital will eventually lead to monopolies and many other types concentrations of wealth and power

You used the atari example. Sure, that company fell but that doesn't validate your reasoning. The fact is that people don't depend upon atari (or video games for that matter) like they depend upon food and shelter. Therefore companies that don't provide the essentials will become obsolete, but the companies that dictate the availability of the essentials that we do NEED have much more momentum and vitality to prevent themselves from going under. They can afford the force-field while others simply can't. Thus some kind of monopoly is imminent. And to have a monopoly on the things we dependently NEED is the worst thing that can happen.

The first part of the video explains enron and answers eboyds question. There can't be a monopoly in a free market system. We wouldn't have this problem.

Sure, in the theory of capitalism, companies don't lobby the government to bend the rules to benefit themselves, but the fact is that capitalism breeds this kind of conduct. Some people might disagree and say,"No that's just those people's conduct, not capitalism's fault." Well even if this is the case, capitalism attracts people with this kind of conduct, so either way this type of conduct becomes a problem. So yes, capitalism either creates the behavior or it attracts people who already have the behavior. It all boils down to greed, that's it.

How does this guy account for all the other companies that fucked up?????

Seriously, have you not realized what capitalism does? They'll fucking lobby the government to make it illegal to collect rain water in a desert. No joke, they've done this. Marx saw this long ago.

Now I know it isn't right to demonize something under generalizations, but there is a logical following from human nature to the rewards of capitalism that make it easy to predict (before its even proven itself to be true) that capitalism is fucked up.

Here's some more info about Enron

Added (04/Dec/09, 9:48 Pm)
---------------------------------------------

Every argument made by a capitalist about it being the govn't's fault has been valid. You can't say it's bullshit just because there are companies that continue to exploit a mixed economy. That's giving more and more examples of why mixed economies don't work... that's it.

Basically if you ask a capitalist "what's your justification for capitalism?" they'll respond "because I only care about myself." HAHAHAHA OH MY FUCKING GOD HA HA FUCKING HA. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!