3. Fly away and live with your family in the Amazon, you could hunt snakes and feed your family with their venom, it would make them stronger, free will will allow you to do this.

4. Hide in a supermarket and live there when it's closed, free food for you and your family.

5. Steal DJ Premier's beat collection and sell it on ebay.

6. Try and kick Eboyd's ass and rob him.

7. Take Eboyd's car and drive to the mountains in Canada, I'm not sure what you could hunt there though but I hear their healthcare is great.

Who says they have to get a job? Free will, it's up to them.

But sure, they don't "have" to get a job. They will do whatever they are stimulated to do.

What that means is we shouldn't be naive and think that somehow we are beyond natural laws. You are doing that when you assume free choice or freewill exists. Anything involving free-thinking suffers from the problems I have laid out.

However, they're are people who desire relaxation and delicious (though fattening) foods more than working out and eating healthy.

Neither choice is really bad, it's their decisions; but they need to accept those decisions and know that if they WANT to, they can change. There wasa some period of time where I was stayin up real late everyday, not working out, being lazy blah blah blah, and I was looking like shit. So that gave me motivation to workout everyday, eat healthy, and all that stuff. The problem with society today is that we have welfare programs that promote inefficiency.

Above is how most people think of themselves. They think there is their body, and then there is an inner mind that delegates actions. That is a large failure of logic. Because that inner mind would then need its own inner mind, and that inner mind would need an inner mind, and that inner mind would need an inner mind, so on and so on, its an infinite regress. There is no inner-self that is doing the choosing. It is all one functioning couterbalancing system. We just are. I don't know how else to explain it to you right now. It's something very difficult to explain to people who have not been exposed to philosophy about it. You realize people write entire books about it? I don't think I'll get through to you.

The inner-self is an old idea that came when people long ago made assumptions about consciousness due to illusions because vital information about our existence was not available to them. These illusory assumptions may have become pathological memes that have carried through time and passed down generations. But perhaps they are not passed on. Even if they are not, these assumptions may simply by an intuitive reaction that our brains have to its own consciousness. Either way, people can be educated out of these assumptions.

By you saying this, you are eliminating personal responsibility from the picture. This runs parallels with the explanation that I give that eliminates personal responsibility.

Although I believe it is false that selfishness is human nature, it is sort of the same idea. The same idea being that people have no control over their behaviors and actions.

Your old argument (about selfishness & human nature) is now logically inconsistent by your current one about freewill. Because by extrapolation, I could say by your reasoning that it is human nature to be lazy, or to be stupid, or to be hopeless. By that reasoning, the jobless people would then not be held personally responsible for not getting a job, and not personally responsible for their own happiness. But of course, all that is bull, just like selfishness and greed being human nature is bull.